Michelin, a name synonymous with culinary excellence and a beacon for food enthusiasts around the globe, has recently ventured into a new domain with the launch of its hotel rating system, the Michelin Key.
NB: This is an article from Shiji
Subscribe to our weekly newsletter and stay up to date
This move marks a significant expansion of Michelin’s influence from the gourmet dining scene to the broader hospitality industry. We compared the professional ratings from the Michelin guide, with those of guests to see how they stack up.
Michelin Enters Hotel Reviews
Given Michelin’s historic impact on restaurants, where a single star can transform an establishment’s future and success, it’s exciting to speculate on this new system’s potential effects on hotels. One can’t help but wonder what the future holds.
Will the hotels awarded a Michelin Key experience a significant rise in demand and be able to increase their rates dramatically? And how will this impact the dynamics between prestige, price, and preference in the hotel industry?
As a global leader in hotel reputation management we have data on the guest perception of hotels which becomes the hotel’s reputation. Guest ratings are more subjective than professional ratings and we wanted to compare how the two stack up. To do this we used our industry standard index, the GRI.
THIS COMPARISON BETWEEN MICHELIN KEYS AND GRI SCORES UNDERSCORES THE DIVERSITY OF EXCELLENCE IN THE HOTEL INDUSTRY AND OPENS UP A DIALOGUE ON THE EVOLVING CRITERIA OF WHAT MAKES A HOTEL TRULY EXCEPTIONAL.
Objective Analysis vs. Subjective Insights
We analysed the Michelin Keys against the Guest Review Index for Paris and found it presents an intriguing picture of the hospitality landscape. Although an inverse relationship was identified between the number of Michelin keys and the GRI, with 3-key Michelin Hotels scoring a yearly GRI of 94.60% against 95.15% for 2-keys and 95.25% for 1-key hotels, this divergence wasn’t deemed statistically significant.
Furthermore, only a fraction of Michelin Keys hotels, specifically 12 out of 39, were featured in the top 50 list based on their yearly GRI performance. The best among the 3-key category, the Four Seasons Hotel George V, Paris, only managed to secure the 15th position, trailing behind Hotel Lutetia, a 2-key establishment that clinched the 4th spot. This indicates a complex relationship between luxury ratings and guest satisfaction.
Our comparison also sheds light on the operational scale and guest experience, particularly the average number of rooms across different categories of Michelin Keys hotels and their GRI scores. Notably, 1-key hotels, with an average of 40 rooms, were the only group to have a lower-than-average room count compared to the city’s benchmark of 57 rooms, suggesting a preference for smaller, boutique settings which is aligned with the Michelin Keys Award’s emphasis on exceptional guest experiences in boutique hotels.
